The hidden costs of deflecting expenses in corporate software development
- agile management
- automation
- financial planning
- Agile Finance System
My mother was preparing for a much-needed holiday. With a goldfish at home, she faced a simple problem: who would feed the fish while she was away? Rather than investing in a cheap automatic feeder, she decided to ask her son (me) to travel to her house to feed the fish. What seemed like a straightforward solution (for her) turned out to be far more costly (for me). The gas for my trips ended up being at least six times more expensive than an automatic feeder.
This story, while simple, mirrors a common and often costly occurrence in corporate environments. Organizations frequently deflect costs to other departments rather than investing in automation and other efficient solutions. This practice can be particularly detrimental in software development, where manual labor, though often hidden in different budgets, ends up costing much more in the long run.
The True Cost of Manual Labor
In the corporate world, manual labor is often more expensive than automation over time. However, because these costs typically appear in different budgets, the full financial impact is obscured. For example, a marketing team might rely on manual processes for data entry instead of investing in automated scripts. While the immediate software development budget remains low, the marketing team incurs higher labor costs and reduced productivity.
Implementing agile management practices, such as OKRs and QBRs, fosters greater transparency, alignment, and flexibility, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently and strategic goals are consistently met across the organization.
This deflection of costs impacts not just the department bearing the brunt of the expense but also the overall organizational efficiency. Hidden costs accumulate, leading to longer project timelines, increased error rates, and employee burnout.
The Need for Corporate-Wide ROI and TCO Calculations
To avoid these pitfalls, organizations should adopt a holistic approach to financial planning, incorporating Return on Investment (ROI) and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculations across all departments. This means evaluating the long-term benefits of automation against the recurring costs of manual labor (including the cost caused by errors and delays).
For instance, automating a routine data entry task might have an upfront cost for developing the necessary software, but the savings in labor costs, error reduction, and increased efficiency can lead to significant ROI over time. By considering TCO, companies can ensure that all associated costs, including maintenance and upgrades, are factored into the decision-making process.
Implementing an Agile Finance System
An effective way to mitigate the issue of cost deflection is through an agile finance system. Such a system fosters transparency and collaboration among departments, preventing the outsourcing of costs. Here’s how:
- Unified Budgeting: By adopting a unified budgeting approach, organizations can ensure that costs are evaluated and approved at a corporate level. This reduces the likelihood of individual departments deflecting costs to others.
- Cross-Departmental Collaboration with OKRs: Encouraging collaboration between departments ensures that all stakeholders understand the impact of their decisions on the organization as a whole. Implementing Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) can help align department goals with the company's overall strategy. For example, IT operations can work with marketing to automate processes, sharing both the cost and the benefits. OKRs can provide a clear framework for setting and achieving shared objectives.
- Real-Time Financial Reporting: Implementing real-time financial reporting tools helps track expenditures across departments. This transparency ensures that any cost deflection is immediately visible and can be addressed promptly.
- Agile Budget Adjustments with QBRs: Agile finance systems allow for quick adjustments to budgets based on changing needs and priorities. Implementing monthly monitoring and Quarterly Business Reviews (QBRs) ensures that financial performance and strategic goals are regularly reviewed and adjusted. This flexibility ensures that resources are allocated efficiently, supporting the overall strategic goals of the organization.
Conclusion
The story of my mother’s goldfish serves as a simple yet powerful reminder of the pitfalls of deflecting costs. In the corporate world, this practice can lead to inefficiencies and hidden expenses that ultimately hinder organizational success. By adopting a holistic approach to financial planning and implementing agile finance systems, companies can ensure that costs are managed transparently and efficiently, driving long-term value and success.
Investing in automation and ensuring that costs are shared equitably across departments not only saves money but also fosters a culture of collaboration and efficiency. It’s a lesson every organization can benefit from, ensuring they aren’t caught off guard by the true cost of manual labor and deflected expenses.